August 31, 2009

Not a Wedding Photographer—Part 1

I am not a wedding photographer. I do not want to be a wedding photographer. And, after you see this week’s photos, you will probably say: “It’s a good thing that you do not want to be a wedding photographer, because if you did, you have a lot of work to do!”

I know what you are thinking. If you are not a wedding photographer and do not want to be one, how in the world is it that you are presenting wedding photographs on your blog? Well, it is a long story, so let’s just say that I agree to be the second shooter at a wedding during a moment of temporary insanity.

What was my job at the wedding? I was to shoot the groom and groomsmen before the ceremony, the bride outside the church, the ceremony from the balcony and some candid shots after the ceremony. A little advice here for anyone thinking about being the second shooter at a wedding: photographing a bunch of guys is no picnic, especially not at a wedding. Why? Because guys do not like having their photos taken and they really do not want to be the guy who messes-up anyone woman’s wedding by being “the dork in the bad photograph.”

All the groomsmen at the wedding were great guys, but they were guys. So, getting a great GQ shot at the wedding was not really in the cards. Today’s shot is of my groomsmen and Master Hunter. Why is almost everyone watching Hunter? Well, it might have something to do with the fact that at the rehearsal he did a few drop kicks of the ring pillow.

Enjoy.

Camera settings: Nikon D3, Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8 at 20mm, shot at ISO 200, f/9.5 and 1/90th of a second with Nikon SB-800s shot through a translucent umbrella at camera left and right and triggered by Nikon SU-800 using CLS.

Post Processing:

Lightroom—Set white and black points, added mid-tone contrast, clarity.

Photoshop—Cloned a few hot spots out of the photograph and used nik Color Efex Pro tonal contrast filter to add contrast to shadows, mid-tones and highlights.

4 comments:

  1. Good details in everyone's clothes. Love the looks on the groomsmen's faces. They are definitely not sure what Master Hunter is about to do. Good moment photo.
    Debbie

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very nice photo Patrick!

    This composition reminds me of something Craig Tanner pointed out in his street photographay workshop. Basically he pointed out how effective a group portrait can be when some members of the group are connected to each other (the second, third and fourth groomsman looking at Hunder) and only one or two persons are connected to the camera (Hunter and the first groomsman). The result is informal and fun but the portrait still has real impact!

    Well done!
    Barry

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Barry, the guys are connected with each other, thanks to Hunter. I like the odd-man-out because he seems to emphasize how the other three are acting.
    Good Job.
    Charles M

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great shot. An interesting non-typical wedding shot. Looking forward to more...

    ReplyDelete