I interrupt the scheduled post to
bring you “Sharpness—Revisited”.
I had several comments regarding
last Tuesday’s post that basically said what was I trying to do with this
photo. Well, I was not really
trying to do much more than show the amount of sharpness that today’s DSLRs
capture right out of the camera.
I did forgot to mention one thing about the image that I showed—in Lightroom 3, I did use the adjustment brush to reduce the clarity and sharpness of Lauren’s skin (i.e., I had too much details in that area of the photograph to do Lauren justice—she has wonderful skin).
I did forgot to mention one thing about the image that I showed—in Lightroom 3, I did use the adjustment brush to reduce the clarity and sharpness of Lauren’s skin (i.e., I had too much details in that area of the photograph to do Lauren justice—she has wonderful skin).
The comments did get me thinking
about how people look at photographs and how photographers present
photographs. Tuesday’s post was
presented to show only one aspect of digital capture—sharpness of today’s
DSLRs. To me, the difference
between a snapshot and a photograph is the photographer putting his/her intent
or interpretation into the image.
With that in mind, let’s assume that the image was going to be used by
an eye make-up manufacture to promote their product. What would I do?
I would want to draw even more
attention to the eyes. How? I would sharpen the eyes, add a little saturation to the iris, add a
highlight opposite the catch-light to add depth to the eyes, remove the redness in the whites of the eyes
(note, I usually do not brighten the whites because it gives people that "devil-eye look") and finally burn the skin to darken it and thus lighten the eyes. Not a lot of difference but I think you
will agree the revised version draws your attention even more to the eyes and hopefully would help sell more product for the manufacturer.
It is my personal belief that
successful photographs almost always have a little piece of the photographer
within them. They are not just a
collection of pixels recorded by their camera. Think about that and let me know what you think!
I have included both versions here
so that it will be easier for you to compare them. Hopefully you will be able to see the added details in the first photo.
Enjoy
WOW. I know it is not your intent in all of this but I would like more specifics as to how you did the various thinks in Photoshop. I was particularly interested in your comments about removing redness from the whites of the eye. Good job making your point.
ReplyDeleteAllen
I notice that the eyes seem to have a lot more life to them. Is that because of the increase in details?
ReplyDeleteTim
Could you walk us through how you made the changes? The changes are effective without being over the top.
ReplyDeleteSam T
zhengjx20160511
ReplyDeletelouis vuitton
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton bags
ray bans
coach factory outlet
michael kors outlet clearance
kate spade handbags
asics shoes for men
louis vuitton purses
montblanc pen
coach outlet online
replica rolex watches
adidas stan smith
adidas originals store
longchamp outlet
coach outlet
air jordan 4
louis vuitton outlet
rolex watches
air max
air max 95
north face jackets
cheap oakley sunglasses
louis vuitton bags
nike roshe run
louis vuitton handbags
tory burch outlet online
coach outlet store online
ralph lauren
juicy couture
coach outlet
coach factory outlet online
longchamp handbags
louis vuitton outlet stores
coach outlet clearance
nike air force 1 white
burberry handbags
jordan 3 powder blue
michael kors outlet clearance
coach outlet store online clearances